|
Volusia to challenge S. Putnam
Wal-Mart By Al Krombach
The Volusia County Council has called for legal action
against its counterpart in Putnam County, voting to challenge
an industrial planned unit development (PUD) in South
Putnam.
Putnam County commissioners approved on Dec. 20 a 235-acre
PUD on Clifton Road that would allow construction of an
850,000-square-foot Wal-Mart food warehouse and distribution
center on former agricultural land. The $40 million business
would employ at least 600 in economically depressed South
Putnam, company representatives have said.
But Volusia County officials said they’re upset that they
weren’t notified in advance. They fear the facility, to be
located about a mile north of the county line, will impact
Northwest Volusia as well as South Putnam.
“The development is contiguous to Volusia County,” said
Volusia County Councilman Dwight Lewis, who represents
Northwest Volusia. “There was no intergovernmental
coordination. I don’t think there was an environmental study.
There was no transportation study done (on U.S. 17) in
Volusia.”
Lewis said that by Wal-Mart officials’ own admission,
hundreds of trucks would travel U.S. 17 daily, up to 80
percent of them southbound through Seville, Pierson and
Barberville.
“Those trucks will pass through school zones for two or
three elementary schools, a middle school and a high school,”
he said.
Lewis said he also has environmental concerns. The
warehouse site is close to the Haw Creek Conservation Area,
which Volusia has made efforts to protect, he said.
“In Volusia, this is a low-intensity-use, rural area,” he
said. “It’s the same on the Putnam County side of the line.
This development would be a high-intensity industrial use.
“The people at the (Dec. 20) meeting said this doesn’t meet
the criteria of a development of regional impact. Well, it
does. It does affect the whole region.”
Lewis said that although the Volusia County government
supports four-laning of U.S. 17, there is no proposed state
funding for widening in the next 20 years. Construction of the
Wal-Mart warehouse would do nothing to hasten that, he
said.
“If this is built you will change the character of Putnam
County,” he said. “I don’t want you to change the character of
Volusia County.”
Lewis, who introduced the motion to challenge Putnam’s
decision, said he would prefer to see the project moved
elsewhere in Putnam.
Putnam County Commission Chairwoman Linda Myers said Monday
the commission had not been made formally aware of Volusia’s
action. It is unfortunate that Volusia County took this track,
she said.
“If anything good comes of this, it may be that we’ll have
some means to coordinate transportation and other issues
better in the future,” she said. “It’s just that there is no
forum for us to keep each other informed.”
She said, for example, a large apartment project for
agricultural workers was built in Volusia County on the Putnam
County line, but Putnam County government was told nothing
about it.
If one governmental body takes another to court, they are
generally required by law to take part in a conflict
resolution process before the dispute goes before a judge. The
Volusia County Council’s request for action is in the hands of
its attorney. Attorneys for Volusia and Putnam counties could
not be reached for comment late Monday.
Clifton Road resident and PUD opponent Mary Stevens said
she and her husband, Tom, were pleased by Volusia County’s
action.
“We are delighted that Volusia’s County Council has gone to
bat for not only Volusia County’s citizens, but for us, Putnam
County citizens,” she said in an e-mail to the Palatka Daily
News. “How pathetic that our own commission did not have the
foresight to thoroughly investigate and consider the negative
impact of such a venture in such an inappropriate place.”
Lake Crescent Citizens for Responsible Growth will continue
to oppose the PUD, she said.
akrombach@palatkadailynews.com |